Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Geospan Corp. v. Pictometry International Corp., No. 12-1032 (Fed. Cir. May 29, 2012)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1032
Decided
May 29, 2012
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

GEOSPAN CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant.

2012-1032

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota in Case No. 08-CV-0816.

JUDGMENT

JOSEPH P. TITTERINGTON, Dunlap Codding, P.C., of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were DOUGLAS J. SOROCCO and D. WARD HOBSON.

GRANT D. FAIRBAIRN, Fredrikson & Bryson, P.A., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were DARREN B. SCHWIEBERT and KURT J. NIEDERLUECKE.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 29, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Geospan Corp. v. Pictometry International Corp., No. 12-1032 (Fed. Cir. May 29, 2012).

Record ID
CAFC-12-1032-20120529
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-12-1032-20120529

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.