Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Mainline Corporate Holdings, Ltd., No. 11-1609 (Fed. Cir. June 14, 2012)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 11-1609
Decided
June 14, 2012
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IN RE MAINLINE CORPORATE HOLDINGS,

LIMITED

2011-1609

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in No. 90/010,191.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL N. RADER, Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C., of Boston, Massachusetts. argued for appellant. With him on the brief was CHELSEA A. LOUGHRAN.

FRANCES M. LYNCH. Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor and William LaMarca, Associate Solicitor.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and WALLACH, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 14, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Mainline Corporate Holdings, Ltd., No. 11-1609 (Fed. Cir. June 14, 2012).

Record ID
CAFC-11-1609-20120614
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-11-1609-20120614

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error