Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Apple Inc. v. International Trade Commission, No. 11-1592 (Fed. Cir. July 23, 2012)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 11-1592
Decided
July 23, 2012
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

APPLE INC.,

Appellant,

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee,

and

EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY,

Intervenor. 2011-1592

Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-717

JUDGMENT

BRIAN FERGUSON, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellant.

PANYIN A. HUGHES, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were JAMES M. LYONS, General Counsel, and

2MICHELLE W. KLANCNIK, Acting Assistant General Counsel.

ALAN L. BARRY, K&L Gates LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for intervenor. With him on the brief were MICHAEL J. ABERNATHY, JASON A. ENGEL and BENJAMIN E. WEED; and MICHAEL J. BETTINGER, of San Francisco, California; and ERIC C. RUSNAK, of Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 23, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Apple Inc. v. International Trade Commission, No. 11-1592 (Fed. Cir. July 23, 2012).

Record ID
CAFC-11-1592-20120723
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-11-1592-20120723

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.