Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Midtronics, Inc. v. Aurora Performance Products LLC., No. 11-1589 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 20, 2012)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 11-1589
Decided
August 20, 2012
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

MIDTRONICS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

AURORA PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS LLC

(DOING BUSINESS AS ARGUS ANALYZERS) and

BPPOWER, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants.

2011-1589

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in Case No. 06-CV-3917, Judge Milton I. Shadur.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT LOREN WAGNER, Picadio Sneath Miller & Norton, P.C., of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, argued for the plaintiff-appellee. Of counsel on the brief were JAMES R. BURDETT and RICHARD B. LAZARUS, Barnes & Thornburg, LLP, of Washington, DC.

CRAIG M. SCOTT, Scott & Bush Ltd., of Providence, Rhode Island, argued for the defendants-appellants. With him on the brief was CHRISTINE K. BUSH.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and O’MALLEY,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 20, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Midtronics, Inc. v. Aurora Performance Products LLC., No. 11-1589 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 20, 2012).

Record ID
CAFC-11-1589-20120820
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-11-1589-20120820

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error