Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Datatreasury v. U.S. Bank, No. 11-1587 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 7, 2011)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 11-1587
Decided
October 7, 2011
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order on Motion
Length
4 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. Wuiuh

of

~tate~ ~ourt §ppeal~ for tbe jfe heral

~irtuit

DATATREASURY CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v_

U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

Defendant-Appellant,

AND

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

THE CLEARING HOUSE PAYMENTS COMPANY,

LLC,

Defendant,

AND

VIEWPOINTE ARCHIVE SERVICES, LLC,

Defendant,

AND

BANCORP SOUTH BANK AND BANCORPSOUTH,

INC.,

Defendants,

AND

BANK OF MONTREAL, BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA,

CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE,

INTRIA ITEMS, INC., NATIONAL BANK OF

CANADA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, SYMCOR,

INC., AND TORONTO-DOMINION BANK,

Defendants,

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

2DATATREASURY CORP v. US BANK 2

AND

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON

CORPORATION,

Defendant.

2011-1587

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in case no. 06-CV-0072, Chief Judge David J. Folsom.

DATATREASURY CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

Defendant,

AND

THE CLEARING HOUSE PAYMENTS COMPANY,

LLC,

Defendant-Appellant,

AND

VIEWPOINTE ARCHIVE SERVICES, LLC,

Defendant-Appellant,

AND

BANCORP SOUTH BANK AND BANCORPSOUTH,

INC.,

Defendants,

AND

Figure on page 3 of the opinion

33 DATATREASURY CORP v. US BANK

BANK OF MONTREAL, BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA,

CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE,

INTRIA ITEMS, INC., NATIONAL BANK OF

CANADA, ROYAL BANK OF CANADA, SYMCOR,

INC., AND TORONTO-DOMINION BANK,

Defendants,

AND

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON

CORPORATION,

Defendant.

2011·1604, ·1605

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in case no. 06·CV·Q072, Chief Judge David J. Folsom.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The parties move to dismiss Viewpointe Archive Ser· vices, LLC and The Clearing House Payments Company L.L.C. as parties in 2011·1587 and to withdraw The Clearing House Payments Company L.L.C.'s appeal no. 2011·1604, and Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC's appeal no. 2011·1605.

Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion to dismiss Viewpointe and The Clear· ing House from 2011·1587 is granted in part. The parties4 DATATREASURY CORP v. US BANK 4 will be listed in the caption as defendants. The revised official caption is reflected in the order.

Figure on page 4 of the opinion

(2) The motion to withdraw 2011-1604 and 2011-1605 is granted. 2011-1604 and 2011-1605 are dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs in 2011-1604 and 2011-1605.

FOR THE COURT

OCT 07 2m1

lsI Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc: Jeffrey A. Lamken, Esq.

Bruce E. Clark, Esq. John J. Feldhaus, Esq. John R. Emerson, Esq.

s21

.ncr

0 7 2011 Issued As A Mandate (As To 2011-1604, -1605 Only):

FILED

II.S. COIIRT OF APPEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

OCT 072011

JANHORBALY

CLERK

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Datatreasury v. U.S. Bank, No. 11-1587 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 7, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-11-1587-20111007
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-11-1587-20111007

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.