Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Ocean Innovations, Inc. v. Gulf Coast Floating Docks, Inc., No. 11-1582 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 10, 2012)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 11-1582
Decided
October 10, 2012
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

OCEAN INNOVATIONS, INC. (formerly known as

Jet Dock Licensing, Inc.)

and JET DOCK SYSTEMS, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants,

v.

GULF COAST FLOATING DOCKS, INC., and RICHARD HILL (doing business as Eco-Dock),

Defendants,

and

DIVERSIFIED WHOLESALE MARINE, INC. (doing

business as Sailorman),

Defendant,

and

ERA MARINE PRODUCTS, INC., VERSADOCK,

ROY AHERN,

and GEORGE DABROWSKI (doing business as PIC

Marine),

Defendants-Appellants.

2011-1582,-1614,-1634, 2012-1220,-1234

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in Case No. 03-CV-0913, Judge John R. Adams.

2JUDGMENT

GORDON D. KINDER, II, Law Office of Gordon D. Kinder, of Cleveland Heights, Ohio, argued for plaintiffs-cross appellants.

VYTAS M. RIMAS, Rimas Law Firm, PLLC, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for defendants-appellants.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 10, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Ocean Innovations, Inc. v. Gulf Coast Floating Docks, Inc., No. 11-1582 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 10, 2012).

Record ID
CAFC-11-1582-20121010
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-11-1582-20121010

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.