Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

CY Technology Group, LLC. v. Groupon, Inc., No. 11-1568 (Fed. Cir. July 13, 2012)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 11-1568
Decided
July 13, 2012
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

CY TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC and MOBGOB,

LLC,

Plaintiffs/Counterclaim

Defendants-Appellants,

and

RICHARD YOON, SCOTT CHUNG and TED

CHUNG,

Third-Party Defendants-Appellees,

v.

GROUPON, INC.,

Defendant/Counterclaim/Third Party Plaintiff-Cross

Appellant.

2011-1568,-1598

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Case No. 10-CV-7287, Senior Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer.

2JUDGMENT

ALEXANDER C.D. GIZA, Russ August & Kabat, of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiffs/counterclaim defendants-appellants and third party defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were MARC A. FENSTER and ANDREW D. WEISS.

DAVID B. ABEL, DLA Piper LLP (US), of Los Angeles, California, argued for defendant/counterclaimant/third party plaintiff-cross appellant. With him on the brief was PATRICK S. PARK.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 13, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

CY Technology Group, LLC. v. Groupon, Inc., No. 11-1568 (Fed. Cir. July 13, 2012).

Record ID
CAFC-11-1568-20120713
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-11-1568-20120713

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.