Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Picture Patents, LLC. v. Aeropostale, Inc., No. 11-1558 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 13, 2012)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 11-1558
Decided
April 13, 2012
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

PICTURE PATENTS, LLC,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant,

and

INTELLINET, INC.,

Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant,

v.

AEROPOSTALE, INC., DICK’S SPORTING GOODS,

INC., MLB ADVANCED MEDIA, L.P.,

MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL PROPERTIES, INC., NBA MEDIA VENTURES, LLC, NBA PROPERTIES, INC., NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION,

and THE CHARLOTTE RUSSE, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

GSI COMMERCE SOLUTIONS, INC. and GSI

COMMERCE, INC.,

Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellees,

and

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES

CORPORATION,

Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee.

2011-1558

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 07-CV-5567, Judge John G. Koeltl.

2JUDGMENT

THOMAS J. PARKER, Alston & Bird, of New York, New York argued for plaintiff/counterclaim defendant-appellant Picture Patents, LLC. and counterclaim defendant-appellant Intellinet, Inc. With him on the brief were MICHAEL S. CONNOR and DAVID M. ALBAN, of Charlotte, North Carolina.

NATHAN K. CUMMINGS, Cooley LLP, of Reston Virginia, argued for defendants-appellees Aeropostale, Inc, et al and defendants/counterclaimants-appellees GSI Commerce, et al. With him on the brief were LORI MASON; and JANET L. CULLUM, of New York, New York

MARK J. ABATE, Godwin Procter LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant/counterclaimant-appellee International Business Machines Corporation. With him on the brief were CALVIN E. WINGFIELD, JR.; and WILLIAM F. SHEEHAN, of Washington, DC.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 13, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Picture Patents, LLC. v. Aeropostale, Inc., No. 11-1558 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 13, 2012).

Record ID
CAFC-11-1558-20120413
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-11-1558-20120413

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.