Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Rudy, No. 11-1556 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 21, 2012)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 11-1556
Decided
February 21, 2012
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IN RE CHRISTOPHER J. RUDY

2011-1556

(Serial No. 08/683, 105)

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

JUDGMENT

CHRISTOPHER J. RUDY, of Port Huron, Michigan, pro se. COKE MORGAN STEWART, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor and THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Associate Solicitor.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

District Judge*).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 21, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Footnotes

  1. * Honorable Jeremy Fogel, District Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Rudy, No. 11-1556 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 21, 2012).

Record ID
CAFC-11-1556-20120221
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-11-1556-20120221

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.