Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Randall MAY International, Inc. v. DEG Music Products, Inc., No. 11-1530 (Fed. Cir. May 29, 2012)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 11-1530
Decided
May 29, 2012
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit RANDALL MAY INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

DEG MUSIC PRODUCTS, INC.

and DYNASTY USA, Defendants-Appellees.

2011-1530

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Case No. 05-CV-0894, Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr.

JUDGMENT

KAINOA ASUEGA One LLP, of Newport Beach, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. On the brief was PETER R. AFRASIABI.

DENNIS G. MARTIN, Blakely, Sokoloff, Taylor & Zafman, LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for defendant-appellee.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 29, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Randall MAY International, Inc. v. DEG Music Products, Inc., No. 11-1530 (Fed. Cir. May 29, 2012).

Record ID
CAFC-11-1530-20120529
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-11-1530-20120529

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.