Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Buttercup Legacy, LLC., No. 11-1450 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 12, 2012)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 11-1450
Decided
March 12, 2012
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit IN RE BUTTERCUP LEGACY, LLC

2011-1450

Reexamination No. 90/008,820

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

JUDGMENT

JOHN M GUYNN, Workman Nydegger, of Salt Lake City, Utah, argued for appellant. Of counsel on the brief was KEVIN W. BATES, Hatch, James & Dodge, of Salt Lake City, Utah.

SCOTT C. WEIDENFELLER, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent & Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and WILLIAM LAMARCA, Associate Solicitor. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 12, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Buttercup Legacy, LLC., No. 11-1450 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 12, 2012).

Record ID
CAFC-11-1450-20120312
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-11-1450-20120312

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.