Fed. Cir.

In re Devicor Medical Products, Inc., No. 11-1414 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 14, 2012)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 11-1414
Decided: March 14, 2012
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IN RE DEVICOR MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

2011-1414

(REEXAMINATION NO. 90/008,824)

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

JUDGMENT

MARK P. LEVY, Thompson Hine LLP, of Dayton, Ohio argued for appellant.

SYDNEY O. JOHNSON, JR., Associate Solicitor, United States Patent & Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor and SCOTT C. WEIDENFELLER, Associate Solicitor.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and PROST, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 14, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Devicor Medical Products, Inc., No. 11-1414 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 14, 2012).

Record ID: CAFC-11-1414-20120314
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-11-1414-20120314

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error