Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Geospan Corp. v. Pictometry International Corp., No. 11-1380 (Fed. Cir. June 5, 2012)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 11-1380
Decided
June 5, 2012
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

GEOSPAN CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,

Defendant-Cross Appellant.

2011-1380,-1405

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota in Case No. 08-CV-0816, Judge Ann D. Montgomery.

JUDGMENT

KURT J. NIEDERLUECKE, Fredrikson & Bryson, P.A., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were DAVID L. LILLEHAUG, DARREN B. SCHWIEBERT and GRANT D. FAIRBAIRN. Of counsel was TED C. KOSHIOL.

JOSEPH P. TITTERINGTON, Dunlap Codding, P.C., of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, argued for defendant/cross appellant. With him on the brief were DOUGLAS J. SOROCCO and D. WARD HOBSON.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 5, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Geospan Corp. v. Pictometry International Corp., No. 11-1380 (Fed. Cir. June 5, 2012).

Record ID
CAFC-11-1380-20120605
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-11-1380-20120605

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.