Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Benson, No. 11-1311 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 28, 2011)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 11-1311
Decided
November 28, 2011
Judge
O'Malley, J.
Document
Order on Motion
Length
3 pages

Nove: This order is nonprecedential. Gnited States Court of Appeals

for the federal Circuit

IN RE GERALD M. BENSON anp KENNETH L.

SMITH .

2011-1311

(Serial No. 11/061,327)

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark OfÏce, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferenees.

IN RE GERALD M. BENSON AnD KENNETH L.

SMITH

2011-1312

(Serial No. 09/515,978)

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark OfÏce, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

ON MOTION

2IN RE BENSON 2 Before RADER, Chief Judge, DYK and O'MALLEY, Circuit

Judges.

Figure on page 1 of the opinion
Figure on page 2 of the opinion

ORDER

The Director of the United States Patent and Trademark OfÏce and the appellants jointly move to remand these appeals for further proceedings.

The Director concedes that decisions of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences omitted “not” in the final sentence of the claim construction section, such that it should have read “and not otherwise surrounded to any extent by replicated substrate 70.” The Director also states that the Board has confirmed that the omissions were in error and create inconsistencies within their respective decisions.

Because the appellants’ opening briefs rely on these omissions and the appellants join these motions for remand, we grant the motions to allow the Board to issue corrected decisions. If the appellants timely appeal those corrected decisions, the docketing fees for those appeals will be waived.

Accordingly, It Is ORDERED THAT: The motions are granted for the limited purpose of remanding these appeals to allow the Board to correct the above-noted omissions.

For THE COURT NOV 2 8 2011 /si Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk

FILED .

ws, couRt oe Pps FoR

NOV 2 8 2011

JAN HORBALY

CLERK

Figure on page 3 of the opinion

33 IN RE BENSON ce: Sandra K. Nowak, Esq.

Raymond T. Chen, Esq.

819 Issued As A Mandate: __ NOV 28 2011

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Benson, No. 11-1311 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 28, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-11-1311-20111128
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-11-1311-20111128

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.