Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc., No. 11-1296 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 18, 2012)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance Claim Construction
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 11-1296
Decided
January 18, 2012
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit INTERMEC TECHNOLOGIES CORP.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

PALM, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2011-1296

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 09-CV-0272, Judge Sue L. Robinson.

JUDGMENT

CARSON P. VEACH, Freeborn & Peters, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were DAVID S. BECKER and JACOB D. KOERING.

ROBERT T. HASLAM, Covington & Burling LLP, of Redwood Shores, California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were MICHAEL M. MARKMAN and ROBERT WILLIAMS of San Francisco, California.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 18, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc., No. 11-1296 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 18, 2012).

Record ID
CAFC-11-1296-20120118
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-11-1296-20120118

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error