Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Schmidt v. Versacomp, Inc., No. 11-1295 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 12, 2012)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 11-1295
Decided
January 12, 2012
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Order on Motion
Length
2 pages

Nore: This order is nonprecedential. nited States Court of Appeals

for the federal Circuit

ANTHONY P. SCHMIDT, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant, ;

v.

VERSACOMP, INC. (DOING BUSINESS AS TNT

LIFT SYSTEMS), AND RICHARD ULRICH,

Defendants-Cross Appellants.

2011-1295, -1341

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in case no. 08-CV-60084, Judge Adalberto Jordan.

ON MOTION

Before NEWMAN, LINN, and REYNA, Circuit Judges.

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

ORDER

Versacomp, Inc. and Richard Ulrich (Versacomp) move without opposition for the second time to dismiss Anthony P. Schmidt, Jr.’s appeal for failure to file a brief.2 SCHMIDT v. VERSACOMP 2

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

Versacomp previously moved to dismiss the appeal due to Schmidt's failure to file a brief. Rather than dismissing the appeal, this court allowed Schmidt to file a brief no later than October 11, 2011. This court gave Schmidt a strong warning that failure to file a brief by the extended deadline may result in dismissal of his appeal. Schmidt has not filed a brief, nor has he requested an extension of time to file.

Upon consideration thereof, It Is ORDERED THAT: Versacomp’s motion to dismiss is granted.

For THE CouRT JAN 12 2012 /s/ Jan Horkaly

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk

ce: Anthony P. Schmidt, Jr. US. court HED cats FOR

John F. Bradley, Esq. THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT s24 JAN 12 2012

JAN HORBALY

CLERK Issued As A Mandate: JAN 12 2012

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Schmidt v. Versacomp, Inc., No. 11-1295 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 12, 2012).

Record ID
CAFC-11-1295-20120112
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-11-1295-20120112

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.