Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., No. 11-1227 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 1, 2011)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 11-1227
Decided
September 1, 2011
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order on Motion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. Gnited States Court of Appeals

for the federal Circuit

KING PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

AND KING PHARMACEUTICALS RESEARCH AND

DEVELOPMENT, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

AND

PHARMACEUTICAL IP HOLDING, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SANDOZ INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2011-1227

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in case no. 08-CV-5974, Chief Judge Garrett E. Brown, Jr.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The appellants move to withdraw their appeal. Upon consideration thereof,

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

2KING PHARMA v. SANDOZ 2

It IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

For THE COURT

SEP_0 1 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk

ce: F, Dominic Cerrito, Esq.

Michelle S. Rhyu, Esq. Martin B. Pavane, Esq. s21

s A Mandate: SEP 01 2011

Issued A .

FILED

U.S, COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

SEP 01 2011

JAN HORBALY

CLERK

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

King Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., No. 11-1227 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 1, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-11-1227-20110901
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-11-1227-20110901

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.