Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Joao Bock Transaction Systems, LLC. v. Sleepy Hollow Bank, No. 11-1211 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 13, 2011)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 11-1211
Decided
December 13, 2011
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit JOAO BOCK TRANSACTION SYSTEMS, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SLEEPY HOLLOW BANK and

JACK HENRY & ASSOCIATES, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

2011-1211

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 03-CV-10199, Senior Judge Warren W. Eginton.

JUDGMENT

JOHN F. WARD, Ward & Olivo, of New York, New York, argued for the plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were MICHAEL G. GABRIEL; and FRANK J. CIANO, Goldberg Segalla, of White Plains, New York.

RUSSELL S. JONES, JR., Polsinelli Shughart, PC, of Kansas City, Missouri, argued for the defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was RICHARD P. STITT, of Overland Park, Kansas.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

Judges). ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 13, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Joao Bock Transaction Systems, LLC. v. Sleepy Hollow Bank, No. 11-1211 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 13, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-11-1211-20111213
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-11-1211-20111213

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.