Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Fanimation, Inc. v. Dan’S FAN City, Inc., No. 11-1180 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 20, 2011)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 11-1180
Decided
October 20, 2011
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

FANIMATION, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

DAN’S FAN CITY, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2011-1180

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana in Case No. 08-CV-1071, Judge William G. Hussmann, Jr.

JUDGMENT

DAVID M. LOCKMAN, Maginot, Moore & Beck, LLP, of Indianapolis, Indiana, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were HAROLD C. MOORE and PAUL J. MAGINOT.

DWIGHT D. LUECK, Barnes & Thornburg, LLP, of Indianapolis, Indiana, argued for the defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was MICHAEL R. BRUNELLE.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 20, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Fanimation, Inc. v. Dan’S FAN City, Inc., No. 11-1180 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 20, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-11-1180-20111020
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-11-1180-20111020

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.