Seiko v. Coretronic, No. 11-1120 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2011)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION,

Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant,

and

EPSON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, INC. and

EPSON AMERICA, INC.,

Counterclaim Defendants,

v.

CORETRONIC CORPORATION,

Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee,

and

OPTOMA TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2011-1120

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in Case No. 06-CV-6946, Judge Marilyn Hall Patel.

2JUDGMENT

EDWARD P. WALKER, Oliff & Berridge, PLC, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for plaintiff/counterclaim defendant-appellant and counterclaim defendant appellees. With him on the brief were JAMES A. OLIFF, JOHN W. O’MEARA and WILLIAM J. UTERMOHLEN.

STEVEN D. HEMMINGER, Alston and Bird, LLP, of Menlo Park, California, argued for defendant/counterclaimant-appellee and defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were YITAI HU and ELIZABETH H. RADER. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: