Fed. Cir.

Richards v. SEN, No. 11-1075 (Fed. Cir. May 4, 2011)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 11-1075
Decided: May 4, 2011
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ALAN K. RICHARDS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

PROFESSOR AYUSMAN SEN,

PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY,

PENN STATE RESEARCH FOUNDATION, and MCQUAIDE BLASKO FLEMING & FAULKNER,

INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

2011-1075

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in No. 09-CV-14280, Judge K. Michael Moore.

JUDGMENT

PATRICK D. KELLY, of St. Louis, Missouri, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

LAURA GANOZA, Foley & Lardner, LLP, of Miami, Florida, argued for defendants-appellees. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

2PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, and

MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 4, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Richards v. SEN, No. 11-1075 (Fed. Cir. May 4, 2011).

Record ID: CAFC-11-1075-20110504
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-11-1075-20110504

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error