Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Emcore Corp. v. International Trade Commission, No. 11-1069 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 14, 2011)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 11-1069
Decided
November 14, 2011
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

EMCORE CORPORATION

Appellant,

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee,

and

AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES FIBER IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD., AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP

(SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD., and AVAGO

TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.,

Intervenors.

2011-1069

Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-669

JUDGMENT

FREDERICK A. LORIG, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for the appellant. With him on the brief was SIDFORD LEWIS BROWN. Of counsel on the brief were LOUIS S. MASTRIANI and DANIEL F. SMITH, Adduci, Mastriani & Schaumberg, LLP, of Washington, DC.

2CLINT A. GERDINE, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC. With him on the brief were JAMES M. LYONS, General Counsel and ANDREA C. CASSON, Assistant General Counsel.

RICHARD S. FLORSHEIM, Foley & Lardner, LLP, of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, argued for intervenors. With him on the brief were CYNTHIA J. FRANECKI; JOHN C. VETTER, of Miami, Florida; GEORGE E. QUILLIN, of Washington, DC; and GINA A. BIBBY, of Palo Alto, California. Of counsel were ROBERT F. KRAMER, Novak Duuce + Quigg, LLP, of San Francisco, California, and JEROLD I. SCHNEIFER, of West Palm Beach, Florida.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 14, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Emcore Corp. v. International Trade Commission, No. 11-1069 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 14, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-11-1069-20111114
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-11-1069-20111114

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.