Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

O2 Micro International Ltd. v. Sels, No. 11-1031 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 9, 2011)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 11-1031
Decided
August 9, 2011
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit O2 MICRO INTERNATIONAL LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

JOHN D. VAN LOBEN SELS,

Defendant-Appellant.

2011-1031

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 04-CV-0032, Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham, IV.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT M. HARKINS, JR., Sedgwick LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Of counsel on the brief was RICHARD C. LIN, Howrey LLP, East Palo Alto, California. Of counsel was HENRY C. SU.

JOHN D. VAN LOBEN SELS, Wang, Hartmann, Gibbs & Cauley P.L.C., of Mountain View, California, pro se.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 9, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

O2 Micro International Ltd. v. Sels, No. 11-1031 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 9, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-11-1031-20110809
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-11-1031-20110809

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.