Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Walker Digital v. Capital ONE Services, No. 10-1553 (Fed. Cir. July 28, 2011)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1553
Decided
July 28, 2011
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

WALKER DIGITAL, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CAPITAL ONE SERVICES, LLC, CAPITAL ONE

BANK (USA), N.A., and CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL

CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellees.

2010-1553

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Case No 10-CV-0212, Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson.

JUDGMENT

RODERICK G. DORMAN, Hennigan, Bennett & Dorman, LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were LAWRENCE M. HADLEY, ALAN P. BLOCK, THOMAS B. WATSON and MIEKE K. MALMBERG.

2CHARLES S. BARQUIST, Morrison & Foerster, LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were RYAN J. MALLOY; and DEANNE E. MAYNARD and JOHN P. CORRADO, of Washington, DC.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 28, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Walker Digital v. Capital ONE Services, No. 10-1553 (Fed. Cir. July 28, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1553-20110728
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1553-20110728

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.