Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Bertrand Marc, No. 10-1540 (Fed. Cir. May 12, 2011)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1540
Decided
May 12, 2011
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IN RE BERTRAND MARC

2010-1540

(Serial No. 10/468,449)

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

JUDGMENT

JEFFREY M. GOEHRING, Young & Thompson, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for the appellant. With him on the brief was Andrew J. Patch.

JOSEPH G. PICCOLO, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitors, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia argued for appellee. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and BRIAN T. RACILLA, Associate Solicitor.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LINN, CLEVENGER, and MOORE, Circuit

Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 12, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Bertrand Marc, No. 10-1540 (Fed. Cir. May 12, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1540-20110512
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1540-20110512

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error