Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Memorylink Corp. v. Motorola, Inc., No. 10-1533 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 8, 2011)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1533
Decided
December 8, 2011
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

MEMORYLINK CORP.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

MOTOROLA, INC., JONATHAN P. MEYER, HUGH C. DUNLOP, THOMAS G. BERRY, J. RAY WOOD,

and TERRI S. HUGHES,

Defendants-Appellees.

2010-1533

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in No. 09-CV-7401, Judge William J. Hibbler.

JUDGMENT

PAUL E. SCHAAFSMA, Novus IP, LLC, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

ANNE M. SIDRYS, P.C., Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendants-appellees. With her on the brief were NYIKA O. STRICKLAND and JOEL R. MERKIN. Of counsel was JESS M. KRANNICH.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON, and MOORE, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 8, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Memorylink Corp. v. Motorola, Inc., No. 10-1533 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 8, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1533-20111208
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1533-20111208

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case