Innovative Patents, LLC. v. Brain-Pad, Inc., No. 10-1531 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 6, 2011) — Order on Motion

Nore: This order is nonprecedential. Gnuited States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

INNOVATIVE PATENTS, LLC anp FORCEFIELD,

LLC, .

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

BRAIN-PAD, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2010-1531

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case no. 07-CV-0680, Magistrate

Judge Mary Patricia Thynge.

ON MOTION

Before RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and BRYSON,

Circuit Judges.

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Brain-Pad, Inc. moves to dismiss Innovative Patents, LLC and Forcefield, LLC (nnovative)’s appeal for failure to prosecute. Innovative has failed to respond.

2INNOVATIVE PATENTS v. BRAIN PAD 2

After missing their initial deadline to file an entry of appearance, certificate of interest, and docketing statement, this court directed Innovative to file those items by October 12, 2010. Innovative has still failed to comply with that directive. Innovative has also failed to file its initial brief. Failure to comply with the court’s rules, including the requirements for preparing and filing briefs and other papers may result in dismissal of an appeal for failure to prosecute. See Julien v. Zeringue, 864 F.2d 1572, 1574 (Fed. Cir. 1989).

Accordingly, It Is ORDERED THAT: The motion to dismiss is granted.

FoR THE COURT APR 06 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc: Jeffrey K. Martin, Esq.

John C, Connell, Esq.

819

ued As A Mandate: APR 06 2011

Iss

B.S. COU FIL

RT IED as FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

APR 06 2011

JAld HORBALY

CLERK

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Cite this opinion

Innovative Patents, LLC. v. Brain-Pad, Inc., No. 10-1531 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 6, 2011).

Record ID

CAFC-10-1531-20110406

Permalink

https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1531-20110406

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.