Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Chemi S.P.A. v. Kappos, No. 10-1514 (Fed. Cir. June 8, 2011)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1514
Decided
June 8, 2011
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit CHEMI S.P.A, LORENZO DE FERRA, AND PIETRO

MASSARDO,

Appellants,

v.

DAVID J. KAPPOS, DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Appellee,

and

FIDIA FARMACEUTICI S.P.A.,

Appellee.

2010-1514

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in Reexamination No. 95/000, 138.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT S. SILVER, Caesar, Rivise, Bernstein, Cohen & Pokotilow, LTD, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for

2appellants. With him on the brief was JOSEPH F. MURPHY.

RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, for appellee. With him on the brief were ROBERT J. MCMANUS and NATHAN K. KELLY, Associate Solicitors.

EUGENE T. C. PEREZ, Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, LLP, of Falls Church, Virginia, argued for appellee Fidia Farmaceutici S.P.A. With him on the brief was MARYANNE ARMSTRONG.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 8, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Chemi S.P.A. v. Kappos, No. 10-1514 (Fed. Cir. June 8, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1514-20110608
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1514-20110608

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.