Fed. Cir.

Malico Inc. v. Cooler Master USA Inc., No. 10-1459 (Fed. Cir. May 16, 2011)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 10-1459
Decided: May 16, 2011
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

MALICO INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

COOLER MASTER USA INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2010-1459

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in Case No. 09-CV-0732, Judge Richard A. Jones.

JUDGMENT

PHILIP P. MANN, Mann Law Group, of Seattle, Washington, for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel on the brief was JOHN E. WHITAKER, Whitaker Law Group, of Seattle, Washington.

PAUL T. MEIKLEJOHN, Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, of Seattle, Washington, argued for defendant-appellee.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, GAJARSA, and LINN, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 16, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Malico Inc. v. Cooler Master USA Inc., No. 10-1459 (Fed. Cir. May 16, 2011).

Record ID: CAFC-10-1459-20110516
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1459-20110516

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error