Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Enhanced Security Research, LLC. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 10-1436 (Fed. Cir. June 14, 2011)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1436
Decided
June 14, 2011
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
3 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ENHANCED SECURITY RESEARCH, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. AND 3COM CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellees,

AND

CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. AND CHECK POINT SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES

INC.,

Defendants-Appellees,

AND

FORTINET, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

AND

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES

CORPORATION, NOKIA CORPORATION, AND

NOKIA INC.,

Defendants-Appellees,

AND

SONICWALL, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

AND

SOURCEFIRE, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

2AND

JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2010-1436, -1437

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in Nos. 09-CV-0390 and 09-CV-0871, Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.

JUDGMENT

SARA A. POULOS, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi L.L.P., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With her on the brief were MARTIN R. LUECK, COLE M. FAUVER, JULIA DAYTON KLEIN and BRENDA L. JOLY.

DARYL L. JOSEFFER, King & Spalding LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for all defendants-appellees, except Juniper Networks, Inc. With him on the brief for defendants-appellees Nokia Corporation and Nokia, Inc. were ROBERT F. PERRY and ALEXAS D. SKUCAS, of New York, New York. On the brief for defendants-appellees Cisco Systems, Inc. and 3Com Corporation were HENRY B. GUTMAN and NOAH LEIBOWITZ, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, of New York, New York; and JEFFREY E. OSTROW, of Palo Alto, California. On the brief for defendants-appellees Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. and Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. were EDWARD J. DEFRANCO and JAMES M. GLASS, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, of New York, New York. On the brief for defendant-appellee Fortinet, Inc. was STEFANI E. SHANBERG, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, of Palo Alto, California. On the brief for defendant-appellee International Business Machines Corporation were HOLMES J. HAWKINS III, NATASHA H. MOFFITT, and CHARLES A. PANNELL III, King & Spalding LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia. On the brief for defendant-appellee SonicWALL, Inc. were COLBY B. SPRINGER and

3KENNETH B. WILSON, Carr & Ferrell LLP, of Menlo Park, California. On the brief for defendant-appellee Sourcefire, Inc. were ALEXANDER J. HADJIS, Morris & Foerster LLP, of Washington, DC; and MICHAEL E. ANDERSON, of McLean, Virginia. Of counsel was PETER J. DAVIS, Morrison & Foerster LLP, of Washington, DC.

JONATHAN S. KAGAN, Irell & Manella, LLP, of Los Angeles, California, for defendant-appellee, Juniper Networks, Inc. With him on the brief were MORGAN CHU; DAVID C. MCPHIE and REBECCA CLIFFORD, of Newport Beach, California.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

BRYSON, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 14, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Enhanced Security Research, LLC. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 10-1436 (Fed. Cir. June 14, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1436-20110614
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1436-20110614

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.