Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Aronowitz v. Home Dianostics, Inc., No. 10-1431 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 20, 2011)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1431
Decided
April 20, 2011
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

JACK L. ARONOWITZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

HOME DIAGNOSTICS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2010-1431

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in No. 93-CV-6999, Judge Joan A. Lenard.

JUDGMENT

BERNARDO BURSTEIN, Burstein & Associates, P.A., of North Miami, Florida, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel was ROBERT A. BOUVATTE, JR.

M. GLENN CURRAN, III, Curran Law Group, of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, argued for defendant-appellee. Of counsel on the brief were DALE P. DIMAGGIO, Malin Haley DiMaggio Bowen & Lhota, P.A., of Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Of counsel was DAVID P. LHOTA, Malin Haley DiMaggio Bowen Lhota, P.A., of Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 20, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Aronowitz v. Home Dianostics, Inc., No. 10-1431 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 20, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1431-20110420
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1431-20110420

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.