Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Infosint S.A. v. H. Lundbeck A/S, No. 10-1429 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 11, 2011)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1429
Decided
March 11, 2011
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

INFOSINT S.A.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

H. LUNDBECK A/S, LUNDBECK, INC.,

FOREST LABORATORIES, INC., and FOREST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

2010-1429

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 06-CV-2869, Judge Lewis A. Kaplan.

JUDGMENT

JAMES GALBRAITH, Kenyon & Kenyon, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were MARIA LUISA PALMESE, WALTER E. HANLEY, JR., JOHN R. KENNY, and MERRI C. MOKEN.

PETER J. ARMENIO, Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendants-appellees. Of counsel on the brief were ELLEN A. SCORDINO and BENJAMIN A. LASKY, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, of New York, New York.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 11, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Infosint S.A. v. H. Lundbeck A/S, No. 10-1429 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 11, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1429-20110311
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1429-20110311

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.