In re Ricoh Company, Ltd. Patent Litigation, No. 10-1415 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 8, 2011)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IN RE RICOH COMPANY, LTD. PATENT

LITIGATION

SYNOPSYS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

RICOH COMPANY, LTD.,

Defendant-Appellant.

RICOH COMPANY, LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

AEROFLEX INCORPORATED, AMI

SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., MATROX ELECTRONIC

SYSTEMS, LTD., MATROX GRAPHICS, INC.,

MATROX INTERNATIONAL, INC., MATROX TECH, INC., AND AEROFLEX COLORADO SPRINGS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

2010-1415

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 03-CV-2289, Judge

2James Ware.

JUDGMENT

CARTER G. PHILLIPS, Sidley Austin, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee and defendants-appellees. With him on the brief for plaintiff-appellee were RICHARD D. KLINGLER and RACHEL H. TOWNSEND. Also on the brief were RON E. SHULMAN, TERRENCE J.P. KEARNEY and RICHARD G. FRENKEL, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, of Palo Alto, California, for plaintiff-appellee and defendants-appellees.

GARY M. HOFFMAN, Dickstein Shapiro LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant and plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were KENNETH W. BROTHERS and ERIC OLIVER.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: