Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Bartex Research, LLC. v. Fedex Corp., No. 10-1397 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 22, 2011)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1397
Decided
February 22, 2011
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

BARTEX RESEARCH, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX EXPRESS

CORPORATION, FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE

SYSTEM, INC., and FEDEX KINKO’S OFFICE AND

PRINT SERVICES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellees.

2010-1397

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Case No. 07-CV-0385, Judge Leonard Davis.

JUDGMENT

RICHARD B. MEGLEY, JR., Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were RAYMOND P. NIRO, DAVID J. SHEIKH, and KARA L. SZPONDOWSKI. Of counsel was ANNA B. FOLGERS.

DORIS JOHNSON HINES, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With her on the brief were CHRISTOPHER T. BLACKFORD, JOHN S. SIEMAN, and

2JASON W. MELVIN; and JEFFREY A. BERKOWITZ, of Reston, Virginia. Of counsel on the brief was E. CHRIS CHERRY, FedEx Corporation, of Memphis, Tennessee.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 22, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Bartex Research, LLC. v. Fedex Corp., No. 10-1397 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 22, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1397-20110222
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1397-20110222

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.