Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Vanguard Identification Systems, Inc. v. Kappos, No. 10-1371 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 24, 2011)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1371
Decided
January 24, 2011
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit VANGUARD IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

DAVID J. KAPPOS, DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Appellee,

and

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION,

Appellee.

2010-1371

(Reexamination No. 95/000,034)

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

JUDGMENT

GARY A. ROSEN, Law Offices of Gary A. Rosen, P.C., of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for appellant.

2MARY L. KELLY, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee David J. Kappos, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office. With her on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and WILLIAM LAMARCA, Associate Solicitor.

JAMES P. MCLOUGHLIN, JR., Moore & Van Allen, PLLC, of Charlotte, North Carolina, argued for appellee Bank of America Corporation. With him on the brief was J. MARK WILSON.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 24, 2011 _ /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Vanguard Identification Systems, Inc. v. Kappos, No. 10-1371 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 24, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1371-20110124
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1371-20110124

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.