Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

World Wide Stationary Manufacturing Co., Ltd. v. U.S. Ring Binder, L.P., No. 10-1358 (Fed. Cir. May 5, 2011)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1358
Decided
May 5, 2011
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit WORLD WIDE STATIONERY MANUFACTURING

CO., LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

U.S. RING BINDER, L.P.,

Defendant-Cross Appellant.

2010-1358, -1359

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri in No. 07-CV-1947, Judge Carol E. Jackson.

JUDGMENT

WILLIAM K. WEST, JR. Howrey, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was PAMELA S. KANE. Of counsel on brief were KEITH A. RABENBERG and RICHARD L. BROPHY, Senniger Powers, LLP, of St. Louis, Missouri.

TIMOTHY E. GROCHOCINSKI, The Simon Law Firm, PC, of St. Louis, Missouri, argued for defendant-cross appellant. With him on the brief was ANTHONY G. SIMON.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 5, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

World Wide Stationary Manufacturing Co., Ltd. v. U.S. Ring Binder, L.P., No. 10-1358 (Fed. Cir. May 5, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1358-20110505
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1358-20110505

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.