Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Morris v. Moody, No. 10-1329 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 14, 2011)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1329
Decided
January 14, 2011
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

KYLE MORRIS, SHARING WORLD

ENTERTAINMENT, LLC,

and READSPEAK, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

DON MOODY, GARY FRIEDMAN,

IRA SOCKOWITZ, THE LEARNING BOX, LLC,

JOHN LEE, JACQUELINE MOODY,

READY TO LEARN PARTNERSHIP, LLC,

WORD WORLD, LLC, PETER SCHNEIDER,

WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS, INC., THE PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM,

INC., NOAH SHUBE, and

LAW OFFICES OF FRIEDMAN & SHUBE,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

JOHN DOES 1-10, ABC CORPORATION,

and

XYZ CORPORATION,

Defendants.

2010-1329, - 1363

2Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 08-CV-7683, Judge Jed S. Rakoff.

JUDGMENT

ROGER L. FIDLER, Law Offices of Roger L. Fidler, Midland Park, New Jersey, and ANDREW L. LEE, All Counsel PC, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.

BRAD RICHARD NEWBERG, Reed & Smith, LLP, of Falls Church, Virginia, for defendants-appellees.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 14, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Morris v. Moody, No. 10-1329 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 14, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1329-20110114
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1329-20110114

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.