Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Fast Memory Erase, LLC. v. Intel Corp., No. 10-1302 (Fed. Cir. June 8, 2011)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1302
Decided
June 8, 2011
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

FAST MEMORY ERASE, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

INTEL CORPORATION, NUMONYX B.V.,

NUMONYX, INC., SONY ERICSSON MOBILE

COMMUNICATIONS AB, SONY ERICSSON

MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (USA), INC., and

APPLE INC.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

MOTOROLA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2010-1302

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas in No. 10-CV-0481, Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn.

JUDGMENT

JEFFREY R. BRAGALONE, Shore Chan Bragalone DePumpo, LLP, of Dallas, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were PATRICK J. CONROY and THERESA M. DAWSON.

2E. JOSHUA ROSENKRANZ, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-appellees, Intel Corporation et al. With him on the brief were CHRIS R. OTTENWELLER, CRAIG R. KAUFMAN, STEVEN S. BAIK and STACY B. MARGOLIES, of Menlo Park, California; and MARK S. DAVIES, of Washington, DC.

RUSSELL E. LEVINE, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, for defendant-appellee, Motorola, Inc. With him on the brief was NYIKA O. STRICKLAND.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 8, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Fast Memory Erase, LLC. v. Intel Corp., No. 10-1302 (Fed. Cir. June 8, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1302-20110608
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1302-20110608

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.