Fed. Cir.

Mchugh v. Hillerich & Bradsby Co., No. 10-1296 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 11, 2011)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 10-1296
Decided: February 11, 2011
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

MARK L. MCHUGH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

HILLERICH & BRADSBY CO.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2010-1296

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 07-CV-3677, Judge Jeffrey S. White.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT J. YORIO, Carr & Ferrell, LLP, of Palo Alto, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was CHRISTOPHER P. GREWE. Of counsel was KENNETH B. WILSON.

LAURA A. WYTSMA, Loeb & Loeb, of Los Angeles, California, argued for defendant-appellee.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, SCHALL, and MOORE, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 11, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Mchugh v. Hillerich & Bradsby Co., No. 10-1296 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 11, 2011).

Record ID: CAFC-10-1296-20110211
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1296-20110211

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error