Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

U.S. Ring Bender, L.P. v. Staples the Office Superstore, LLC., No. 10-1284 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 10, 2010)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1284
Decided
December 10, 2010
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

U.S. RING BINDER, L.P.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

STAPLES THE OFFICE SUPERSTORE, LLC,

WORLD WIDE STATIONERY MANUFACTURING

CO., LTD.,

CHARLES LEONARD NATIONAL, INC., and CHARLES LEONARD WESTERN, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

2010-1284, -1425

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri in case no. 08-CV-0583, Magistrate Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III.

JUDGMENT

DAVID L. APPLEGATE, William Montgomery & John Ltd., of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

KEITH A. RABENBERG, Senniger Powers, LLP, of St. Louis, Missouri, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was RICHARD L. BROPHY.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Dcember 10, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

U.S. Ring Bender, L.P. v. Staples the Office Superstore, LLC., No. 10-1284 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 10, 2010).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1284-20101210
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1284-20101210

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.