Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Qimonda AG. v. International Trade Commission, No. 10-1270 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 18, 2011)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1270
Decided
January 18, 2011
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

QIMONDA AG,

Appellant,

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee,

and

LSI CORPORATION,

Intervenor,

and

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, SEAGATE

TECHNOLOGY (US) HOLDINGS INC., SEAGATE

TECHNOLOGY LLC, and SEAGATE (US) LLC,

Intervenors.

2010-1270

Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-665.

JUDGMENT

2BRIAN R. MATSUI, Morrison & Foerster LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were G. BRIAN BUSEY, MARK E. UNGERMAN and MICHAEL W. MAAS; and ADAM KESER, of McLean, Virginia.

SIDNEY A. ROSENZWEIG, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were JAMES M. LYONS, General Counsel, and ANDREA C. CASSON, Assistant General Counsel. BRUCE S. SOSTEK, Thompson & Knight LLP, of Dallas, Texas, argued for all intervenors. With him on the brief for LSI Corporation were JANE P. BRANDT, HERBERT J. HAMMOND, MAX CICCARELLI, RICHARD L. WYNNE, JR. and MICHAEL HEINLEN. Also on the brief for Seagate Technology, et al.. were JOHN M. CARACAPPA and CHARLES F. SCHILL, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, of Washington, DC.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 18, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Qimonda AG. v. International Trade Commission, No. 10-1270 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 18, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1270-20110118
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1270-20110118

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.