Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Alexsam v. Interactive Communications, No. 10-1267 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 15, 2010)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1267
Decided
December 15, 2010
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ALEXSAM, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATIONS

INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

and

INTERACTIVE COMMUICATIONS INC.,

Defendant.

2010-1267

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Case No. 03-CV-0337, Judge T. John Ward.

JUDGMENT

JAMES J. FOSTER, Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C., of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were ROBERT M. ABRAHAMSEN and HUNTER D. KEETON.

2WILLIAM M. ATKINSON, Alston & Bird LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for defendant-appellant. On the brief was ROBIN L. MCGRATH. Of counsel on the brief was BRIAN M. BUROKER, Hunton & Williams LLP, of Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 15, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Alexsam v. Interactive Communications, No. 10-1267 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 15, 2010).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1267-20101215
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1267-20101215

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.