Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Flexiteek Americas, Inc. v. Plasteak, Inc., No. 10-1256 (Fed. Cir. May 27, 2011)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1256
Decided
May 27, 2011
Judge
Gajarsa, J.
Document
Order on Motion
Length
3 pages

Norte: This order is nonprecedential. Gnited States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

FLEXITEEK AMERICAS, INC. anp FLEXITEEK

INTERNATIONAL AS,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

PLASTEAK, INC. AnD PLASDECK, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants,

AND

ANDRE BATISTA, .

Defendant.

2010-1256

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in case no. 08-CV-60996, Judge James I. Cohn.

ON MOTION

Before GAJARSA, MAYER, and Prost, Circuit Judges.

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

ORDER

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

2FLEXITEEK AMERICAS v. PLASTEAK INC 2

This court directed the parties to respond whether PlasTEAK, Inc. and PlasDECK, Inc.'s (PlasTEAK) appeal from the February 5, 2010 order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida granting a permanent injunction should be dismissed as moot in light of the district court’s subsequent July 20, 2010 order terminating the permanent injunction. Flexiteek Americas, Inc. and Flexiteek International AS (Flexiteek) respond and argue that this appeal is moot. The appellant, PlasTEAK, argues that this appeal is not moot.

PlasTEAK urges this court not to dismiss the appeal arguing that the appeal should continue to resolve its concerns regarding liability for infractions of the injunction between issuance of the injunction and the court’s termination order. Although that issue might present a case or controversy, it does not do so here. This appeal is of the district court's injunction, which is no longer in effect, and not of any possible order for contempt. Notably, even if PlasTEAK were to prevail in this appeal, that would not necessarily dispose of any question as to contempt of an injunction. See generally Emery Air Frieght Corp. v. Local Union 295, 449 F.2d 586, 591 (2d Cir. 1971) (Accordingly, the preliminary injunction as granted was improper. However, this conclusion does not dispose of the question of contempt, to which we now turn.”).

Accordingly, It Is ORDERED THAT:

(1) This appeal is dismissed. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Figure on page 3 of the opinion

33 FLEXITEEK AMERICAS v. PLASTEAK INC

For THE COURT

MAY 27 2011 (s/ Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk

ce: 8, Tracy Long, Esq. FILED

1 Bruce H. Wilson, Esq ROURT OF APPEALSF OR 8

MAY 27 2011

JAN HORBALY

CLERK

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Flexiteek Americas, Inc. v. Plasteak, Inc., No. 10-1256 (Fed. Cir. May 27, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1256-20110527
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1256-20110527

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.