Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

United Access Technologies, LLC. v. Earthlink, Inc., No. 10-1251 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 12, 2011)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1251
Decided
October 12, 2011
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

UNITED ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC (FORMERLY

INLINE CONNECTION CORPORATION, BROADBAND

TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIONS, LLC, AND PIE SQUARED,

LLC),

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

EARTHLINK, INC.,

Defendant-Cross Appellant.

2010-1251, -1273

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in consolidated case nos. 02-CV-0272 and 02-CV-0477, Magistrate Judge Mary Patricia Thynge.

JUDGMENT

JEFFREY R. BRAGALONE, Shore Chan Bragalone DePumpo LLP, of Dallas, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant. On the brief were ALFONSO GARCIA CHAN and THERESA M. DAWSON and DANIEL F. OLEJKO.

MATTHEW C. GAUDET, Duane Morris, LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for defendant-cross appellant. With him on the brief were L. NORWOOD JAMESON and LEAH J. POYNTER.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (Chief Judge RADER, LINN, and DYK,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 12, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

United Access Technologies, LLC. v. Earthlink, Inc., No. 10-1251 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 12, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1251-20111012
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1251-20111012

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error