Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

SLR Partners, LLC v. B. Braun Medical Inc., No. 10-1188 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 12, 2010)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1188
Decided
October 12, 2010
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

SLR PARTNERS, LLC and

ROZI MEDICAL DEVICES LIMITED,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

B. BRAUN MEDICAL INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

.____________________

2010-1188

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in no. 09-CV-1145, Judge Jeffrey T. Miller.

JUDGMENT

JONATHAN HANGARTNER, X-Patents, APC, of La Jolla, California, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.

JOHN C. O’QUINN, Kirkland & Ellis LLP of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were DANIEL F. ATTRIDGE, EDWARD C. DONOVAN and NATHAN S. MAMMEN.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (GAJARSA, LINN, and Prost, Circuit

Judges).

2AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 12, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

SLR Partners, LLC v. B. Braun Medical Inc., No. 10-1188 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 12, 2010).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1188-20101012
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1188-20101012

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error