Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Cheetah Omni LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., No. 10-1169 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 12, 2010)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1169
Decided
October 12, 2010
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

CHEETAH OMNI LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS USA, INC.,

Defendants,

and

MITSUBISHI DIGITAL ELECTRONICS

AMERICA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2010-1169

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 08-CV-0279, Leonard Davis.

JUDGMENT

THOMAS A. LEWRY, Brook Kushman P.C., of Southfield, Michigan, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were FRANK A. ANGILERI, JOHN S. LEROY and ROBERT C.J. TUTTLE.

VINCENT J. BELUSKO, Morrison & Foerster LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was NICOLE M. SMITH.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 12, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Cheetah Omni LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., No. 10-1169 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 12, 2010).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1169-20101012
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1169-20101012

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.