Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Alcesia SRL v. International Trade Commission, No. 10-1156 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 24, 2011)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1156
Decided
January 24, 2011
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ALCESIA SRL,

Appellant,

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee,

and

PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC.,

Intervenor. 2010-1156

Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-643.

JUDGMENT

WILLIAM ZEITLER, Law Offices of William Zeitler, of McLean, Virginia, argued for the appellant.

DANIEL E. VALENCIA, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC,

2argued for the appellee. With him on the brief were JAMES M. LYONS, General Counsel, and ANDREA C. CASSON, Assistant General Counsel for Litigation.

KENNETH L. CHERNOF, Arnold & Porter, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for the intervenor. With him on the brief was CARL S. NADLER. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 24, 2011 _____ /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Alcesia SRL v. International Trade Commission, No. 10-1156 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 24, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1156-20110124
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1156-20110124

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.