Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Nilssen v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 10-1139 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 10, 2011)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1139
Decided
November 10, 2011
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

OLE K. NILSSEN,

Plaintiff,

and

GEO FOUNDATION, LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellant.

v.

WAL-MART STORES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP.,

Defendant-Appellee.

and

MENARD, INC., ACE HARDWARE CORP.,

TRUSERV CORPORATION, AND HOME DEPOT,

INC.,

Defendants,

and

LOWE’S HOME CENTERS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

and

IKEA ILLINOIS, LLC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

2010-1139

2Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in No. 04-CV-5363, Judge Robert W. Gettleman.

JUDGMENT

LELAND W. HUTCHINSON, JR., Freeborn & Peters, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was JONATHAN HILL.

ANTHONY J. FITZPATRICK, Duane Morris, LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for all defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was CHRISTOPHER S. KROON for Costco Wholesale Corporation. Also on the brief were GARY W. SMITH, Posternak Blankstein & Lund, LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.; KIMBALL R. ANDERSON, and KATHLEEN B. BARRY, Winston & Strawn, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, for Lowes’s Home Centers, Inc., and BUREDEN J. WARREN, McDermott Will & Emery, LLP, of Washington, DC, for IKEA, Illinois, LLC. Of counsel was MARGARET M. DUNCAN, for IKEA, Illinois, LLC.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 10, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Nilssen v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 10-1139 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 10, 2011).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1139-20111110
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1139-20111110

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.