Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Phoenix Solutions, Inc. v. the Directv Group, Inc., No. 10-1125 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 4, 2010)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1125
Decided
August 4, 2010
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

2010-1125

PHOENIX SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

THE DIRECTV GROUP, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Central District of California in case no. 08-CV-0984, Senior Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer.

JUDGMENT

R. JOSEPH TROJAN, Trojan Law Offices, of Beverly Hills, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

JASON L. PELTZ, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was PAUL J. SKIERMONT. Of counsel on the brief were STEVEN M. ANDERSON and DAVID A. SERGENIAN, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP of Los Angeles, California.

STEVEN C. SEREBOFF, SoCal IP Law Group LLP, of Westlake Village, California, for amicus curiae Conejo Valley Bar Association. With him on him on the brief were MARK A. GOLDSTEIN and M. KALA SARVAIYA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 4, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Phoenix Solutions, Inc. v. the Directv Group, Inc., No. 10-1125 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 4, 2010).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1125-20100804
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1125-20100804

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.