Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Baker Hughes, Inc. v. Nalco Co., No. 10-1124 (Fed. Cir. May 7, 2010)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 10-1124
Decided
May 7, 2010
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2010-1124

BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED and

BAKER PETROLITE CORPORATION,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, v.

NALCO COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant. John H. Barr, Jr., Bracewell & Giuliani LLP, of Houston, Texas, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. With him on the brief were Warren W. Harris, Jeffrey L. Oldham and Christopher A. Shield. Of counsel on the brief was Bruce Wieder, Dow Lohnes PLLC, of Washington, DC. Michael J. Abernathy, K&L Gates LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Robert M. Barrett and Jason A. Engel. Appealed from: United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt .

2United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2010-1124

BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED and

BAKER PETROLITE CORPORATION,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, v.

NALCO COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant. Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Southern District of

Texas

In CASE NO(S). 09-CV-1885 This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (RADER, GAJARSA, and PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED May 7, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly __________________________

Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Baker Hughes, Inc. v. Nalco Co., No. 10-1124 (Fed. Cir. May 7, 2010).

Record ID
CAFC-10-1124-20100507
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-10-1124-20100507

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.